Montgomery Ward vs. Sears: The Catalog War

calendar Jun 22, 2026 / · 9 min read · brand-history catalog-history  ·
Share on: linkedin copy

The Company That Invented the Catalog — and Lost the War

On August 18, 1872, a 28-year-old Chicago dry-goods salesman named Aaron Montgomery Ward mailed out a single sheet of paper listing 163 products with prices and ordering instructions. Total startup capital: $1,600, split between two employees and a rented room on North Clark Street. That document is the first general-merchandise mail-order catalog in American history. Ward was not building on anyone's model — he was inventing one. For roughly two decades he had no serious competition, and the formula worked: by 1874 the catalog had grown to 32 pages; by 1876 it ran to 152 pages with 3,000 items; by the early 1900s Ward's mailing list exceeded 3 million names. Richard Sears, who would eventually eclipse him entirely, did not mail his first general catalog until 1896 — 24 years after Ward had already defined the category.

The reason Ward matters to anyone studying catalog brand history is precisely this first-mover fact. He solved a genuine market problem: rural and farming families in the Midwest were systematically overcharged by local general stores with no competition. Ward's strategy, documented by the Chicago History Museum, was to eliminate the middleman entirely, publish a fixed price, and deliver goods to the customer's nearest railroad station. He aligned himself with the Patrons of Husbandry — the Granger movement — to reach exactly that audience, and he backed every transaction with an industry-first guarantee of satisfaction or money back. For two decades he essentially was American mail order.

What happened next is a study in how a first-mover advantage, if not actively defended, becomes merely a head start. When Sears, Roebuck and Co. introduced its first general catalog in 1896, Ward suddenly had a serious rival, and by 1900 the two were nearly even — Ward at $8.7 million in sales against Sears at $10 million. Once Sears passed, it never looked back. The gap between the two companies only widened, and by 1951 Sears was doing more than double Ward's business. The catalog war ran from roughly 1896 to the mid-1950s, and the outcome was decided not by Ward failing at what Ward did, but by Sears being willing to do more of it, faster, and with a shrewder grasp of what American consumers actually wanted.

Ward's First-Mover Advantage: 1872–1896

Aaron Ward's 1872 single-sheet circular was a founding document for American retail. Its logic was simple: the Grangers had organized rural buyers into a political movement, and Ward gave them an economic tool. Farmers who had been paying inflated prices at the local store — often the only store within a day's ride — could now order from a catalog at prices reflecting genuine volume purchasing. The rural isolation that made local merchants powerful became Ward's distribution opportunity. His relationship with the railroad parcel network made the logistics work, and his money-back guarantee, which the Chicago History Museum records as a founding Ward innovation, removed the barrier of buying from a seller you had never met.

The catalog itself grew at a remarkable rate. The 1883 edition ran to 240 pages and listed 10,000 items. Ward's distribution complex, built beginning in 1907 at 618 West Chicago Avenue along the Chicago River, cost approximately $2.5 million and included internal courier systems with roller-skating delivery routes for moving orders through the facility. This was not a mail-order company operating from a back room; it was purpose-built logistics infrastructure, designed for scale. Ward opened physical retail stores starting in 1926 and by the 1930s operated more than 500 of them, making it at that point one of the largest retailers in the country by store count.

The scale of Ward's cultural penetration in this period is hard to overstate. In 1939, a Ward copywriter named Robert May invented Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer as a promotional giveaway booklet for children — a character created as a Ward marketing asset before it was anything else. This is what brand depth looks like: a company so embedded in American domestic life that its promotional materials become national mythology. And yet the competitive position that supported all of this was already eroding. Sears had been gaining on Ward since the late 1890s, and the operational discipline that had made Ward great was about to be eclipsed by a competitor with a sharper commercial instinct and a more aggressive posture toward growth.

Sears Enters and Overtakes: 1896–1920

Richard Warren Sears was not a logistics builder or a cause-aligned merchant in the Ward mold. He was, above all, a salesman. He had started in 1888 selling watches through a mail-order circular, a narrow specialty operation that bore little resemblance to Ward's general-merchandise catalog. When Sears, Roebuck and Co. published its first general catalog in 1896, the timing was right: postal infrastructure was expanding, rural literacy and postal coverage were growing, and Ward — by then the incumbent — had established the category's viability beyond any doubt. Sears did not have to convince anyone that mail-order buying worked. Ward had already done that.

What Sears brought was aggression and editorial instinct. Julius Rosenwald, a Chicago clothing merchant who became a partner in 1895, provided the operational discipline that Sears the salesman lacked — cash flow management, inventory systems, supplier relationships. While Rosenwald built the machine, Sears built the voice. The Smithsonian Magazine account of Sears's rise notes that in 1906 the company constructed a distribution complex occupying three million square feet, and featured a full-page illustration of it in the catalog itself, making the facility a proof of scale and reliability. The message to the rural customer was direct: we are big enough to be trusted, and here is the evidence.

The catalog format itself was a competitive weapon. As FIT New York's retrospective on the Sears catalog notes, Sears kept its catalog deliberately, marginally thinner than Ward's — a calculated choice. When a household received both catalogs and stacked them, the Ward edition went on the bottom and the Sears edition stayed on top. Visibility was a marketing lever before a single page was turned. Sears also absorbed and refined Ward's founding innovations: the money-back guarantee, fixed pricing, rural delivery. But it executed them at higher volume and with a more strident sales voice. By 1900, the sales lead had switched. When parcel post launched nationally in 1913, Sears's sales surged fivefold in the system's first year. Ward grew too, but more slowly. The gap became structural.

The Divergence: Post-War Strategy and the Sewell Avery Catastrophe

The competitive gap that had opened by 1920 might have been closed — or at least stabilized — if Ward had responded aggressively to the post-World War II retail shift. It did not. The decision that sealed Ward's fate was made not by a marketer or a merchandiser but by a chairman named Sewell Avery, who ran Montgomery Ward from 1931 to the mid-1950s and who proved to be exactly the wrong leader for exactly the wrong moment.

Avery had been genuinely useful in the 1930s. Brought in as chairman in 1931 at the urging of J.P. Morgan & Co., he took over a company battered by the Depression and restored it to profitability through cost discipline and operational restructuring. That experience shaped his worldview entirely: he became a man who believed that economic catastrophe was always imminent and that cash preservation was always the correct response. When World War II ended and American families began moving to the suburbs in enormous numbers, Avery concluded that a post-war depression was coming. He refused to open new stores. He refused even to spend on paint to freshen the existing ones. He hoarded capital in anticipation of a crash that never came, planning to acquire failed competitors when it hit.

Sears's leadership drew the opposite conclusion. Under General Robert E. Wood — who had, notably, previously worked for Montgomery Ward before moving to Sears — Sears read the suburban migration clearly and built into it. New shopping-center locations went up across North America's expanding suburbs, with store counts passing 700 by the mid-1950s. While Avery was banking profits, Wood was occupying the retail geography of postwar America. The Wikipedia account of Sewell Avery records the outcome in stark figures: in the first eight years after World War II, Sears's profits rose 229 percent while Ward's rose 21 percent. By 1951, Sears was doing more than double Montgomery Ward's total business volume and had surpassed it in retail store count. Avery left his post in 1954, but the competitive position was already irretrievable.

The Outcome and What the Catalog War Teaches

Montgomery Ward stopped issuing its mail-order catalog in 1985, after more than a century of the format Aaron Ward had launched in 1872. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 1997, emerged briefly under GE Capital ownership in 1999, then announced in December 2000 — after a disappointing Christmas season — that it would cease operations entirely. Liquidation completed in 2001, 129 years after the first catalog. The brand has since been revived as an online retailer under different ownership, without stores or catalogs, a heritage name attached to a commerce operation.

Sears, for its part, discontinued the general-merchandise catalog in 1993 — a separate chapter in catalog history — and its own bankruptcy came in 2018. The symmetry is instructive: both companies fell, but the sequence and the reasons differed. Ward lost the catalog war in the 1940s and 1950s when it failed to build the suburban retail network that Sears built, and that loss was decisive and permanent. Sears won the catalog war, built the suburban empire, and then lost its retail era to Walmart and specialty chains over the following decades.

The lesson that catalog and direct-marketing history draws from the Ward-versus-Sears competition is not simply that being first guarantees nothing — though Ward proves that. It is that scale and aggression during a period of platform transition are worth more than caution, and that the instincts that save a company during one crisis (Avery's Depression-era cost discipline) can become the instincts that destroy it in the next era of growth. Aaron Ward invented the mail-order catalog in 1872 and built something remarkable. He simply also nurtured the conditions for a competitor who understood expansion better than he did — and that competitor found, in Sewell Avery's post-war paralysis, the opening it needed to put the gap beyond closing.

References

Posts in this series